| 12191 (175, 176, 177) Paper Presentation 4 – Influencing Quality of Nursing Care Delivery
 (175) Promoting Best Practice through Outreach
 Jill Bauer, BSN RN, Children's Hospitals of Minnesota, St Paul/Mpls, MN
 
 Abstract
 As a leading hospital rich with information,  resources, and a passion of caring for children, we feel an obligation to “share  our wealth”. The development of our Neonatal Outreach Program promotes sharing  and excellence in the care of infants with hospitals in our entire region. This  program progresses referral staff expertise through clinical consultation,  education and collegial support.
 
 After meeting with rural hospital leaders and educators to assess their  individual needs, we offer our resources, knowledge and expertise to them.  Sharing and developing educational tools to fit their needs promotes best care  for neonatal patients in their hospitals. Opportunity for individual referral  staff growth in their profession advances everyone’s practice and helps to  develop ongoing understanding of the needs of our colleagues in the community  as well as our own.
 
 As our Outreach Program advances levels of education and excellence in others,  it also works to maintain strong partnerships with colleagues throughout the  region. A strong nursing presence exists in our program, but we reach out to  all health care professionals who ask. We openly share our resources without  limitation and do so free of charge with the exception of some full day  certification courses. Examples of outreach include:
 
 -  Certification courses presented at  referral facilities.
 - Individual hospital needs assessments  with tailored follow-up education.
 - Shadowing of our staff by referral  staff demonstrating our care of infants.
 - Transfer case reviews with opportunity  for discussion, consultation and debriefing.
 - Mini-conferences/skill sessions to  meet individual hospital needs.
 - Policy/procedure sharing.
 - Neonatal Simulation.
 
 Learning Objectives
 1. List two benefits of a neonatal outreach program.
 2. Describe at least four steps in the development of a neonatal outreach program.
 3. Name two valuable components of a successful outreach program.
 
 Bibliography
 George A Woodward, MD, MBA, FAAP, (2006).  Outreach education. In American Academy of Pediatrics: Guidelines for Air and  Ground Transport of Neonatal and Pediatric Patients, 241-250.
 
 Hainsworth, Terry. (2006). Development of Critical Care Outreach Nursing  Services. Nursing Times., Volume 102(32), 25.
 
 Yaeger KA, Halamek LD, Coyle M et al. High-Fidelity simulation-based training  in neonatal nursing. Adv Neonatal Care. 2004;4:326-331.
 
 Karlsen, K., The S.T.A.B.L.E. Program Instructor Manual. (2005).
 
 
 (176) Identifying Electronic Tools That Can Assist in the Measurement of Nurse Practitioner Outcomes
 Janice Wilson, DNP CRNP-BC , Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
 
 
 Abstract
 Background:  Neonatal nurse practitioners (NNP) are significant contributors to overall  neonatal outcomes. Their specific outcomes, however are often invisible and few  frameworks exist that adequately measure them.
 
 Purpose: To determine if an evidence-based  electronic peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) procedure note could  be utilized as a tool to evaluate NNP performance/outcomes in a Neonatal  Intensive Care Nursery Setting.
 
 Methods: Using GE Centricity  Perinatal Software, an evidence based three part electronic NNP PICC line  procedure note was developed and implemented. A post implementation survey was  conducted using the Clinical Information Systems Evaluation Scale. SPSS was  used to analyze both survey results as well as the outcomes of the PICC line  note.
 
 Results: Over a three month pilot  period, eighty one percent of note fields were completed in the insertion  section of the note, 85% of fields were completed for the adjustment part of  the note and 88% of the removal note fields were completed. The implementation  was viewed as moderately to highly successful with a CISIES total score of 3.2.
 
 Conclusions: The successful  implementation and pilot of a clinical information system, in this case an  evidence based electronic NNP PICC line procedure note, demonstrates the  potential power of the electronic health record to serve as a tool in the  evaluation of NNP performance, outcomes and competence.
 
 Ongoing Data Collection: The PICC  line note is currently being amended, with a plan to collect and analyze  additional data over the next twelve months.
 
 Learning Objectives
 1. Describe the importance of the use of an electronic approach to the measurement of nurse practitioner outcomes.
 2. Identify the impact that evidence-based guidelines can contribute to the generation of outcome data.
 
 Bibliography
 AARP, Swankin, D., Lebuhn, R. A., &  Morrison, R. (2006, July). Implementing continuing competency requirements for  health care practitioners (2006-16). Retrieved May 4, 2008 from  http://www.aarp.org/ppi.
 
 Allen, P., Lauchner, K., Bridges, R.A., Francis-Johnson, P., McBride, S.G.,  & Olivarez, A. (2008). Evaluating continuing competency: a challenge for  nursing. The Journal of Continuingn Education in Nursing, 39(2), 81-85.
 
 Cimino, J. J., Lee, N., & Bakken, S. (2005). Using patient data to retrieve  health knowledge. AMIA 2005 Symposium Proceedings, 136-138.
 
 Kleinpell, R., & Gawlinski, A. (2005). Assessing outcomes in advanced  practice nursing practice. AACN Clinical Issues, 16(1), 43-57.
 
 National Association of Neonatal Nurses, Pettit, J., & Wyckoff, M. W.  (2007). Peripherally inserted central catheters guideline for practice (2nd  ed.). Glenview, IL: National Association of Neonatal Nurses.
 
 
 
 (177) Changing the Culture of Safety in the NICU
 Shannon Sarver, RN PCF, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
 Coauthor: Jaime Rudolph, BSN RNC-NIC, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
 
 Abstract
 Stated Purpose for the Session: To educate fellow neonatal nurses on the reduction  of Serious Safety Events and the establishment of a culture of safety in the  NICU setting by implementing a peer driven Safety Coach Program.
 
 Background & Importance of the Topic:  With National Patient Safety Goals surrounding the reducion of Serious Safety  Events, this interdisciplinary program was developed to identify both positive  and negative practices that impacted safety in the NICU. By identifying these  practices, the staff is able to promote the positive practices and change the  practices that hinder a positive outcome for the fragile neonatal population.
 
 Description of What will be Covered:  This presentation will describe in detail the Safety Coach Program from  development through implementation and conclude with the rewards of the  program. Description and Case Studies will be utilized to illustrate what is a  Safety Coach, the methods used including the electronic Behavioral Observation  Tool (eBOT), and how it impacts the neonatal population.
 
 Future Direction: The future  direction of this program is to establish a culture of safety in the NICU  setting, ultimately reducing Serious Safety Events. This goal will be achieved  through 200% staff accountability and improvement in areas identified through  the Safety Coach Program.
 
 Learning Objectives
 1. State the role of the safety coach.
 2. Describe how a safety coach affects the safety of the neonate and the reduction of serious safety events in the NICU.
 3. Explain the methods used by a safety coach.
 4. Identify how the information gathered by a safety coach is used.
 
 Bibliography
 Hunter, C., Spence, K., McKenna, K., &  Iedema, R. (2008). Learning how we learn: an ethnographic study in a neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(6),  657-664.
 
 Jirapaet, V., Jirapaet, K., & Sopajaree, C.  (2006). The nurses' experience of barriers to safe
 practice in the neonatal intensive care unit in Thailand. JOGNN: Journal of  Obstetric,
 Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 35(6), 746-754.
 
 The Joint Commission. 2010 National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs). Retrieved  October 12, 2009, from
 http://www.jointcommission.org/patientsafety/nationalpatientsafetygoals.
 
 Ursprung, R., Gray, J., Edwards, W., Horbar, J., Nickerson, J., Plsek, P., et  al. (2005). Real
 time patient safety audits: improving safety every day. Quality & Safety in  Health Care, 14
 (4), 284-289.
 |